What Do "Bad" Clients Cost Your Firm?
1 Comments - Posted By Rob Millard In , Tools for Strategists , , , , - Permalink -
If you were able to ask just one question of a client, with the assurance that the answer would give you a good indication of their level of satisfaction with your firm's services, what would that question be? Fred Reichheld's article The Microeconomics of Customer Relationships (subscription or purchase for $6.50 required,) in the Winter 2006 edition of the MIT Sloan Management Review, has the answer. It is:
"One a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is 'not at all likely' and 10 is 'extremely likely,' how likely is it that you would recommend us to a friend or colleague?"
Depending on the answer, clients would be categorized as promoters (scores of 9 and 10,) passive (7 or 8) and detractors (6 or less.) Note that passives do not straddle the 50% or even the 60% mark. Anything less than 70% is viewed negatively.
General Electric, already the 9th largest company in the world by revenue, is using this model to try to drive its organic growth rate from 5% to 8% pa. According to Reichheld's data, a promoter has a net present value (NPV) to the firm of 1.5 and 2.5 times that of an "average" client (i.e. a passive.) On the other hand, a detractor frequently has a negative NPV. Sometimes, a surprisingly high negative NPV. The article explains how a firm can calculate these figures for themselves and also how to use them. A summary follows:
Continue Reading